SHELF LIFE OF SEMEN EXTENDED WITH ANTIBIOTICS

Pariwat Poolperm
College of Veterinary Medicine
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27606

Introduction

Artificial insemination using fresh diluted semen is used worldwide in the swine industry. Diluted semen is stored for 3 days to 7 days in certain extenders, eg. BTS, Androhep®, Xcell®. Viability of spermatozoa in diluted semen depends on several factors, such as type of extender, type of antibiotics and degree of contamination in semen. Bacterial contamination in semen is one of the factors that occur accidentally during the collection process or from instruments in laboratory. Contamination of diluted semen with E. coli was reported to reduce motility, fertility and viability and to severely damage acrosomal membranes. Adding an appropriate antibiotic could prolong viability and fertility of sperm. The most common antibiotics used in extender are gentamicin, neomycin, a combination of penicillin G and streptomycin, amikacin, lincomycin and ceftiofur.

There is no published study that examined the concentration or effect of antibiotics in extended semen during storage time. Two fundamental questions are; does concentration of antibiotics decrease over period of time and does antibiotics help maintain fertility of sperm cells for longer storage? The present study was designed to determine the influence of antibiotic on semen quality and sperm fertility in minimally-contaminated environment and to study the "pharmacokinetics" of antibiotic concentration in extended semen.

Experimental design

Boar semen was collected from 3 boars at the Swine Educational Unit, NCSU, during July-December 1997. Semen was extended in Beltsville Thawing Solution (BTS). The diluted semen was divided into 5 aliquots, 80 ml each with at least 3x109 cells, to each of which was added one of the following antibiotic solutions, a combination of penicillin G (1,000 IU/ml) and streptomycin sulfate (700 IU/ml), amikacin (200 mg/ml), neomycin sulfate (1 mg/ml), gentamicin sulfate (200 mg/ml) or BTS extender (as a control). All aliquots were then stored at 17OC.

Sperm motility, acrosomal morphology and sperm morphology were determined on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7. Sperm motility was determined by warm caffeine coated slides under phase contrast microscope. Samples of the semen were fixed in formalin buffered saline to determine sperm morphology and acrosomal morphology. The concentrations of gentamicin sulfate and amikacin sulfate were determined in semen samples collected at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 120 hours. The samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was frozen at -70OC until assayed.

For the in vitro penetration assay, semen was diluted as above and store for 5 days. In vitro maturation of oocytes and in vitro fertilization were conducted with a conventional protocol. Sperm from day 0 and day 5 diluted semen was used for in vitro fertilization. Penetrated oocytes were evaluated with the Orcein staining method. Oocytes with a decondensed sperm head(s) or male and female pronuclei were considered penetrated oocytes.

Results

Table 1. Effects of antibiotics on percentage of motility, morphology and normal acrosomal ridge. Values represent means for semen samples from 3 boars, evaluated at day 0,1,2,3,5 and 7.

Treatment
motility (%)
morphology (%)
normal acrosomal ridge (%)
gentamicin
78 a
82
99
neomycin
77 a
82
99
amikacin
74 b
82
99
pen-strep
72 c
81
98
control
70 c
82
98
Values with different superscripts differ at p<0.05

Table 2. Effect of time on percentage of motility, morphology and normal acrosomal ridge. Values represent means for semen samples from 3 boars, treated with antibiotics and control.

Time (days)

Motility (%)
Normal
morphology (%)
Normal
acrosomal ridge (%)
0
86 a
81 a
99.8 a
1
80 b
82 a,b
98.9 b
2
77 c
80 c
98.6 c
3
77 c
84 b
98.4 c,d
5
68 d
82 a,b
98.0 e
7
46 e
79 d
98.2 d,e
Values (within column) with different superscripts differ at p<0.05


Fig. 1. Effect of antibiotics and storage time on percentage of sperm motility


* 60% motility was reported as a cut-off point for fertility in boar semen (Flowers, 1997).

Pharmacokinetics test of concentration of gentamicin and amikacin sulfate did not change over 5 days of storage.

In vitro penetration assay

Table 3. Percentage of in vitro penetration rate (mean) on day 0 and day 5 stored semen with antibiotics.

amikacin
Control
gentamicin
neomycin
pen-strep
boar 1
boar 2
boar 1
boar 2
boar 1
boar 2
boar 1
boar 2
boar 1
boar 2
Day 0
26.7
26.5
22.5
21.3
20.8
21.1
35.9
22.1
33.7
18.4
Day 5
7.7
11.0
6.6
17.2
6.9
16.6
8.2
15.4
2.3
12.0

Fig. 2. Effect of treatment with different antibiotics and storage time on in vitro penetration.

From in vitro penetration, there is no effect of treatment with antibiotics and boar on the percentage of sperm penetration. However, the penetration rate in day 0 semen was greater than that of day 5 semen (18.4-35.9 and 2.3-17.2, respectively, p<0.05).

Discussion

The results show that treatment with antibiotics had an effect on sperm motility only. Semen treated with gentamicin and neomycin sulfate showed greater percentages of motility than the others. Treatment with different antibiotics did not affect sperm morphology and normal acrosomal ridge (Table 1). All semen characteristics were affected by storage time (Table 2). From Fig 1, all treatments showed the same trend of slightly decreased motility from day 0 to day 3 of storage. After 3 days of storage, however, gentamicin, amikacin and neomycin treated groups showed different trends of decreasing in motility compared to that of the penicillin-streptomycin and control groups. Semen treated with penicillin-streptomycin and in the control group showed rapidly decrease in motility after day 3. At day 7 of storage only semen treated with gentamicin showed motility at about 60%. Flowers (1997), reported that inseminated sows with semen that contained lower than 60% of motility would reduce reproductive performance.

From the in vitro penetration assays, there was no effect of treatment with antibiotics on sperm penetration rate. We might conclude that antibiotics did not affect sperm penetration rate. Antibiotics may only protect sperm cells from detrimental effects of bacteria or endotoxin but had no role on sperm cells. Auroux et al (1991), showed the effect of sperm:bacteria ratio on the impairment of sperm motility. The data showed the motility of sperm decreased significantly when the bacterial population was numerous or the sperm count was low. They suggested that bacterial adherence to sperm was the most likely cause of motility decrease and sperm death. This observation would be a primary reason for using the appropriate antibiotics to control bacterial growth and to protect sperm cells.

Conclusion

From the results we can conclude that a combination of penicillin and streptomycin was unable to maintain sperm motility at the same level as gentamicin, amikacin and neomycin sulfate. The antibiotics in semen extender did not show any effect on sperm penetration rate. Antibiotics might play only role in control of bacterial growth in semen, but not on sperm cells. Further studies need to be done on how antibiotics act on sperm cells. The antibiotics had the same influence on sperm quality regardless of boar.

The concentrations of gentamicin and amikacin sulfate were maintained in extended semen for up to 5 days.

Take-Home Message

The degree of contamination of bacteria in semen can be reduced if we are concerned about the sanitation of semen processing from collection in the barn to processing in the laboratory. Quality of antibiotics is another point that should be considered. The use of a high quality source of antibiotic may help to reduce of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. The cost of gentamicin in semen extender is about $5.9 /L, amikacin is $9.46 /L, neomycin is $1.29 /L and penicillin-streptomycin is about $4.26 /L (all ingredients are laboratory grade).

References

Auroux, M.R., Jacques, L., Mathieu, D. and Auer, J. 1991. Is the sperm bacterial ratio a determining factor in impairment of sperm motility: an in-vitro study in man with Escherichia coli. Int J Androl 14: 264-270

Flowers, W.L., 1997. Management of boars for efficient semen production. J Reprod Fert (suppl. 52): 67-78

Sone, M., Chikyu, M., Yoshida, M., Bamba, K. and Ogasa, A. 1992. Prolonged storage of boar semen in liquid form. Jpn J Swine Sci 29(1): 41-50

Suggested reading

Althouse 1997. Comparison of currently used semen extenders in the swine industry. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 19(6): 777-782

Gopalkrishnan, K., Joseph, R. and Sheth, A. R. 1994. Alteration of semen characteristics and regulatory factors in human semen with bacterial infection. Arch Androl 32:213-218

Teague, N. S., Boyarsky, S. and Glenn, J. F. 1971. Interference of human spermatozoa motility by Escherichia coli. Fert Ster 22(5): 281-285