
Introduction
Recent work conducted by Kemp and Soede
(1996) has provided a comprehensive evaluation of the relationship among the
duration of estrus, ovulation, timing of inseminations and fertility. In this
study, ovulation was monitored via real-time ultrasonography allowing for a
precise estimation of its occurrence. Data from this study demonstrate three important
relationships. Firstly, the duration of estrus was inversely related to the
weaning-to-estrous interval. In other words, sows that exhibit estrus within a
short time period after weaning are sexually receptive for longer periods of
times than their counterparts which have extended weaning-to-estrous intervals.
Secondly, although the length of estrus varied among animals, ovulation
consistently occurred at 71% of the duration of estrous. Sows exhibiting estrus
for 48 and 72 hours ovulated at 34 and 51 hours, respectively. And finally, if
matings occurred between 0 and 24 hours prior to ovulation, then fertilization
rates were greater than 90%.
These results are exciting and have important
implications for development of mating regimens. The inverse relationship
between the length of estrus and the weaning- to-estrus interval may provide a
way to further refine the optimal mating regimen for sows on an individual
basis. Obviously, the length of estrus can only be obtained retrospectively
after breeding decisions are made. However, if the weaning-to-estrous interval
is known before breeding is initiated, then it may provide a means to assign
sows to breeding regimens. The objective of this study was to determine the
effectiveness of using the weaning-to-estrus interval as a means of adjusting
both the timing and frequency of matings for sows.
Materials and Methods
A total of 1500 multiparous sows on two
different commercial swine operations were used in the study. Sows on each farm
were divided into 3 categories based on their weaning-to-estrus period: < 5 days;
6-7 days; and > 8 days. The control treatment consisted of breeding sows once every
24 hours beginning at first detected estrus. The adjusted mating treatments were based
weaning-to-estrus intervals and were as follows: sows that returned to estrus
in < 5 days were mated at 24 and 48 hours after first detected estrus; sows that
returned to estrus in 6 or 7 days were mated at 8 and 24 hours after first detected
estrus; and sows that returned to estrus > 8 days were mated at 0 and 8 hours after
first detected estrus. Observation of estrous activity was conducted daily between 06:30
and 08:00 and was continued for all sows even after the completion of their assigned
breeding regimen. All sows received artificial insemination doses from the same
boars containing 4 billion spermatozoa within 36.4 + 2.1 hours of collection.
Farrowing rate, number of pigs born alive and length of estrus were recorded
and analyzed statistically with analysis of variance procedures. The study was
conducted over a 6 month period between July and December.
Results and Discussion
A significant farm by return interval by
breeding treatment interaction was present for both farrowing rate and number
of pigs born alive. Therefore, comparisons between breeding treatments were
made on each farm within each return interval (Table 1). On farm A, no differences
between treatments for each weaning-to-estrous category were observed. In contrast,
on farm B, reproductive performance was reduced for sows receiving the experimental
breeding treatments in the 6-7 and > 8 day groups. Adjustment of breeding strategies
based on the weaning-to-estrous interval was an effective practice on both farms for
animals returning to estrus within 5 days after weaning because reproductive
performance was similar with two versus three matings. However, on farm B, the
changes in the timing and frequency of matings for sows with return intervals
> 6 days appeared to be a detrimental practice resulting in reduced
farrowing rates and litter size.
|
Farrowing rate (%) |
|
Number born alive |
||
Weaning-to-estrus intervala |
Control |
Adjusted |
|
Control |
Adjusted |
Farm A |
|
|
|
|
|
< 5 days |
88.1 + 4.6 |
84.6 + 5.2 |
|
11.1 + 0.3 |
10.9 + 0.2 |
6-7 days |
82.4 + 3.7 |
83.1 + 4.5 |
|
10.6 + 0.3 |
10.7 + 0.3 |
> 8 days |
84.5 + 5.7 |
85.6 + 4.7 |
|
10.8 + 0.2 |
10.5 + 0.3 |
Farm B |
|
|
|
|
|
< 5 days |
83.3 + 3.5 |
86.2 + 4.0 |
|
10.5 + 0.3 |
10.7 + 0.2 |
6-7 days |
85.1 + 4.1 |
72.1 + 3.7* |
|
10.7 + 0.3 |
9.9 + 0.3* |
> 8 days |
84.4 + 4.6 |
70.3 + 4.5* |
|
10.5 + 0.2 |
9.8 + 0.3* |
Reasons for the different responses to the same treatments between farms are not clear.
However, one possibility could involve the variation in the normal pattern of estrous
activity. In addition to reproductive performance, the relationship between the
weaning-to-estrus interval and the duration of estrus was recorded during the study. This
information is summarized in Table 2 and presented as a percentage of sows that expressed
oestrus for a certain period of time (3 days, 2 days, etc.) as a function of the
weaning-to-oestrus interval. For example, on farm A, 90% of the animals that exhibited
estrus within 5 days of weaning remained in estrus for 3 days, while 9% and 1% exhibited
a standing reflex for 2 and 1 days, respectively. It is interesting to note
that on farm B, a large proportion of animals in the 6-7 and > 8 day return
groups had 3 and 2 day estrous periods, respectively, compared with their
contemporaries in herd A. Thus, the reduced reproductive performance in these
groups of animals possibly was a consequence of suboptimal number and/or timing
of matings relative to the duration of estrus (Flowers and Esbenshade, 1993;
Kemp and Soede, 1996).
Weaning-to-estrus interval |
Sows exhibiting estrus for 3 days (%) |
Sows exhibiting estrus for 2 days (%) |
Sows exhibiting estrus for 1 day (%) |
Farm A |
|
|
|
< 5 days |
90.0 |
9.0 |
1.0 |
6-7 days |
11.6 |
65.3 |
23.1 |
> 8 days |
12.5 |
10.7 |
76.8 |
Farm B |
|
|
|
< 5 days |
78.3 |
12.5 |
9.2 |
6-7 days* |
38.4 |
47.3 |
14.3 |
> 8 days* |
27.4 |
57.8 |
14.8 |
If results from both treatments are combined,
then a reasonable breeding protocol for farm A relative to the onset of estrus
would be as follows: < 5 days - 24 and 48 hours; 6-7 days - 0 and 24 hours;
and > 8 days - 0 hours. In contrast, for farm B, a mating regimen of once
each day of estrus seems more appropriate except, perhaps, for sows returning
to estrus within 5 days of weaning. These females could be bred at 24 and 48
hours relative to the onset of estrus without compromising farrowing rates and
litter size.
Summary
In summary, despite the variation between farms, establishment of breeding
regimens based on weaning-to-estrous intervals appears to have potential. The
key to its success, however, is dependent upon thorough documentation of the
pattern of estrous activity within a herd.
References
Flowers, W.L. and Esbenshade, K.L. 1993
Optimizing management of natural and artificial matings in swine. J. Reprod.
Fert. Suppl. 48, 217-228.
Kemp, B. and Soede, N.M. 1996. Relationships of weaning-to-estrus interval
to timing of ovulation and fertilization in sows. J. Anim. Sci. 74, 944-949.