prevalence of gastrointestinal lacerations
at slaughter and effect of feed withdrawal

 

W.E.M. Morrow [1], P.R. Davies [2], J. Eisemann [1], M.T. See [1] , and K. Zering [3]

 

Summary

To help producers decide whether they should withdraw feed prior to slaughter, we designed a study that examined the effect of feed withdrawal on the prevalence of gastrointestinal lacerations at slaughter. We assigned treatments to a finishing floor of 1133 National Pig Development barrows that were sent to slaughter in 3 groups.  Each marketing group (feed withdrawn once, first group; twice, second group; or three times, third group) had an equal number of pigs that had feed withdrawn for 0 (control) 12, or 24 hours. Withdrawal of feed before slaughter decreased the weight of the gastrointestinal tract. The least-squares means weights (+ se) of the gastrointestinal tracts of pigs with no feed withdrawal (7.7kg +0.06) were greater (P = 0.0001) than the pigs with 12 hr feed withdrawal (6.6kg +0.06) and they were greater (P = 0.07) than the pigs with 24 hr feed withdrawal (6.4kg +0.06). The proportion of gastrointestinal tract lacerations ranged by day from 8.3% to 23.9%, but the differences were not significant (P = 0.32). Neither marketing group (feed withdrawn once, twice, or three times) nor the hours feed was withdrawn (0, 12, or 24) affected lacerations.

 

Introduction

To decrease the proportion of PSE pork, Eikelenboom et al. (1991) recommends producers withdraw feed from hogs 12-24 hours prior to slaughter (1). Because producers in the USA are penalized for selling hogs outside a narrow weight range, most who have all-in/all-out facilities will send their hogs to slaughter over 3-4 weeks. In most cases, they withdraw feed from the last load but earlier loads are usually on full feed until they are shipped. Withdrawing feed from hogs before slaughter decreases the weight (2, 3) and presumably solid contents of the gastrointestinal tracts. Consequently, because they are lighter, slaughter workers are less likely to lacerate them during evisceration resulting in decreased carcass contamination (3). This study investigated the effect of 0, 12, or 24 hours feed withdrawal before slaughter on the weight of the gastrointestinal tract and the number and location of lacerations to the tract.

 

Materials and methods

Subjects: In March 1998, 1133 National Pig Development (NPD) barrows from a nursery site were weighed, individually identified and assigned, blocked by weight, to 36 pens. The barn had 40 pens—the other 4 pens held the cull pigs and the extreme lightest and heaviest pigs that were excluded from the study. Each pen of 29-32 pigs had pigs of similar minimum and maximum weight with similar variation between pens. Maximum variation within a pen, rather than minimum, allowed us to progressively select the heaviest third of pigs for slaughter from each pen and simulate the slaughter close-out of a barn of pigs where on about three occasions the heaviest third in the barn are taken to slaughter.

 

Treatments: Treatments included feed withdrawal of 0, 12, and 24 hours and marketing group (1, 2, and 3) selected on weight and having feed withdrawn once, twice, or three times prior to shipment. Feeders to the pens on 12 or 24 hour withdrawal treatment and containing hogs scheduled for slaughter were shut off and any feed in the feeding troughs was returned to the pens’ feeders.  The experimental design was a 3 by 3 factorial.

 

Shipments: For the first and second marketing groups, the 10 heaviest pigs in each pen were visually identified and shipped (feed withdrawn once or twice). The third marketing group consisted of all pigs remaining in all the test pens. Pigs were individually tattooed with a unique 4 digit identifying number coded to describe the day and treatment. In lairage, pigs had free access to water but not feed.

 

Gastrointestinal tracts (GIT): Standard evisceration procedure at the plant was as follows: the head was removed, the brisket cut open, the abdominal cavity opened, the anus (bung) dropped, then the gastrointestinal tract and thoracic cavity contents (pluck) were cut from the carcass and placed on a tray. On the tray, the esophagus was cut from the stomach and the pluck removed and placed on a hook for further processing. Immediately after the abdomens were opened we tagged the gastrointestinal tracts with temporary paper numbered tags which we correlated to the carcass tattoos. The gastrointestinal tracts were then removed from the viscera trays, placed in plastic bags and taken off-line for us to examine. Each tract was examined in detail, section by section, and noted which sections (stomach, small intestine, cecum, and colon) were lacerated. 

 

Statistical Analyses: All data were analyzed in SAS. Categorical data were examined initially in the PROC FREQ and then GENMOD procedure.

 

Results

Pigs were loaded and left the farm between 2-5 am, traveled for 1hr 15 min (range: 48 min to 1 hr 45 min) and held in lairage for 3hr 50 min (range: 1 hr 58 min to 4 hr 47 min). Overall, 15.7% of the 773 gastrointestinal tracts examined were lacerated in one or more sections (Figure 1.).


Figure 1.  Percentage of lacerations overall and by sections

 

Withdrawal of feed before slaughter decreased the weight of the gastrointestinal tract. The least-squares means weights (+ se) of the gastrointestinal tracts of pigs with no feed withdrawal (7.7kg +0.06) were greater (P = 0.0001) than the pigs with 12 hr feed withdrawal (6.6kg +0.06) and they were greater (P = 0.07) than the pigs with 24 hr feed withdrawal (6.4kg +0.06). The proportion of gastrointestinal tract lacerations ranged by day from 8.3% to 23.9%, but the differences were not significant (P = 0.32). Neither marketing group (feed withdrawn once, twice, or three times) nor the hours feed was withdrawn (0, 12, or 24) affected lacerations. Also, gastrointestinal tract weight increased (P = 0.0001) as carcass weight increased.

 

Discussion

The proportion of lacerations in this study (15.5%) was higher than previously reported (4-5%)(3). The difference may be due in our study to the high processing speed for evisceration (18 pigs per minute) and/or a more detailed examination of the gastrointestinal tracts in this study which may have decreased under-reporting. As expected, the weight of the gastrointestinal tracts decreased with increasing duration of feed withdrawal.

 

From the perspective of bacterial contamination, an important finding is the low prevalence of cecal lacerations and lack of association of cecal lacerations to treatment or carcass weight. This is important because most contamination occurs after singing (5) and the ceca is the second highest site for recovery of Salmonella (71%) after the palatine tonsils (93.5%) (6). In addition, the cecum usually has a very fluid content, which could readily spill and potentially grossly contaminate the carcass. The association of lacerations to particular sections of the gastrointestinal tract may arise because of the effect of feed withdrawal (stomach and colon) and carcass weight (small intestine), on the rhythm of the evisceration process.

 

Implications

Based on these data the incidence of gastrointestinal lacerations at slaughter is not affected by withdrawing feed from hogs prior to slaughter.

 

References

1. Eikelenboom, G., A. H. Bolink, W. Sybesma, (1991). Effects of feed withdrawal before

delivery on pork quality and carcass yield. Meat Science 29: (1) 25-30.

2. Kephart, K. B., D. S. Bailey, J. R. Bollinger, M. P. Fournier, D. W. Hartman, E. W. Mills, C.

A. B. Meyers, and P. Pitcher. (1996). Effect of feed withdrawal prior to slaughter on

carcass weight and gut fill in market hogs. J. Amin. Sci. 74 (Suppl. 1)

3. Miller M.F., M. A. Carr, D. B. Bawcom, C. B. Ramsey, and L. D. Thompson. 1997.

Microbiology of pork carcasses from pigs with differing origins and feed withdrawal

times. J. Food Protection. 60:242-245.

4. Statistical Analysis System. 1996. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.

1996.

5. Gerats G.E.C., 1990. Working towards quality. Aspects of quality control and hygiene in the

meat industry. Thesis, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.

6. Wood R.L., A. Pospischil, and R. Rose. 1989. Distribution of persistent Salmonella

typhimurium infection in internal organs of swine. Am. J. Vet. Res. 50: 1015-1021.



[1] Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

[2] College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

[3] Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA