NCSU Extension Swine Husbandry 1996


September, 1996 . Volume 19, Number 8

SUMMARIES OF SWINE RESEARCH SUMMARIES PRESENTED AT THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANIMAL SCIENCE

At the recent annual meeting of the American Society of Animal Science in Rapid City, South Dakota many swine related research papers were presented. The following seven papers that are summarized have some potential for rapid application in the swine industry.

Todd See


FLOOR SPACE NEEDS FOR HEAVY MARKET BARROWS

Space recommendations for finishing pigs have usually been 8 square feet per animal. This recommendation was used with pigs that went to slaughter at 220 to 230 lbs. Slaughter weights have moved progressively heavier in recent years, however. Average slaughter weights for may producers now approach approximately 250 lbs. How have the space allocation needs per animal changed as slaughter hogs were held to these heavier weights?

Researchers Mike Brumm and Jim Dahlquist recently reported (1996 Nebraska Swine Report) the results of their investigations into space requirements with barrows that were fed to 300 lbs. They selected 300 lbs. for an end weight since they recognized that many producers were already approaching 270 lbs. for an average sale weight. One hundred eighty single source barrows were used and were randomly allotted to test groups with space allocation treatments of 7 , 9, or 11 sq.ft. per pig. These space allocations were in addition to the space occupied by the feeders.

Each pen held 12 pigs. If a pig died or had to be removed from the trial for other reasons, the pen size was adjusted so that the space allocation per pig remained the same during the complete trial. This procedure was maintained until the pigs reached 300 or more lbs. As individual pigs reached the target weight of 300 lbs., they were removed and no additional pen space adjustments were made.

The building in which this study was conducted was a fully slatted, naturally ventilated confinement facility. A two-hole feeder and two nipple waterers were in each pen. Intermittent sprinklers were used in the summer which were activated at 80 degrees F.

The initial diet was a corn-soybean meal mix with 1.1 % lysine. The lysine content was reduced by 0.1 % at 100 lbs. This 0.1 % reduction was repeated again at 150, 200, and 250 lbs.

Table 1 outlines the pig performance observed in this trial.

Table 1. Effect of floor space allocation on barrow performance

Floor space (ft2/pig)
Itema 7 9 11
No. pens
5
5
5
Pig weight, lb
Initial
43.0
43.1
43.2
29 d
92.4
92.0
90.6
99 d
233.6
237.6
229.2
Final
298.8
301.3
296.6
CV, within pen wt
8.2
6.9
7.9
ADG, lb/d
0 to 29 d
1.71
1.69
1.64
0 to 99
1.93
1.96
1.88
Overall
1.85
1.89
1.82
ADFI, lb/d
0 to 29 d
3.28
3.31
3.26
0 to 99 d
5.35
5.50
5.31
Overall
5.76
5.93
5.83
Feed/gain
0 tp 29 d
1.92
1.96
1.99
0 to 99 d
2.78
2.80
2.82
Overall
3.11
3.15
3.21
Carcass last rib midline
backfat depth, in
1.31
1.36
1.35
Lean/gain, lb/d
.65
.66
.65
a CV=coefficient of variation, ADG=average daily gain, ADFI=average daily feed intake, and Feed/gain=feed efficiency.

By the end of the first 29 days on test, a linear decrease (P<.075) was observed in average weight and daily gain as the space allocation increased. However, by the end of 99 days on test the pigs with 9 sq. ft. per pig had the best performance and those with 11 sq. ft. per pig had the poorest. Overall, pig performance exhibited a significant quadratic effect of space allocation on average daily gain with the pigs with 7, 9, and 11 sq. ft. having daily gains of 1.85, 1.89, and 1.82 lbs. per day, respectively.

Carcass backfat, lean gain, and average daily feed intake were not influenced by space allocations. However, feed efficiency decreased (P<.075) as the space allocation increased.

A significant quadratic effect was observed in the variation of individual pig weights within a pen. The least variation occurred among those pigs that were allotted 9 sq. ft. while the most was among those with 7 sq. ft.

As the results in Table 1 suggest, barrows carried to 300 lbs. did well at 9 sq. ft. per pig, based on average daily gain and average daily feed intake.

Charles Stanislaw


ALKALINE BYPRODUCT REDUCES ODOR

Changing the pH of manure with an alkaline byproduct (ABP) may be one way to cut hog odors, according to research conducted at Iowa State University. ABP is an alkaline byproduct from coal-generator power plants, cement manufacturing and lime manufacturing. It is similar to talcum powder in consistency.

In the study, 24 tons of ABP was mixed with 440,000 gallons of hog manure and then added to an earthen storage basin. Air samples were then taken from the storage basin area and downwind of the field after the manure was top spread and analyzed by an odor panel at ISU. The researchers found a marked decrease in odors from ABP-treated hog manure, both when it was in a storage basin and when it was spread on top of a field.

"Our goal was to reduce but not eliminate odors," says Dwaine Bundy, a researcher at ISU involved with this project. "We also felt ABP-treated manure may be an alternative to injection since some land cannot handle injection."

Based on this research, Bundy says adding ABP to manure slurry is one solution for serious odor problems. But he also warns that since ABP gives an initial release of ammonia after agitation with manure, this solution is not recommended for pits in buildings.

HogHealth
Vol. 6, No. 1


Number of accesses to this file:
Last modified August 7, 2000.