NCSU Extension Swine Husbandry 1997


July, 1997 . Volume 20, Number 6

VAN HEUGTEN JOINS EXTENSION SWINE STAFF

Dr. Eric van Heugten joined our Department of Animal Science faculty as Assistant Professor and Extension Swine Nutrition Specialist. He is a native of The Netherlands and received his B.S. and M.S. from the Agricultural University in Wageningen. He received his Ph.D. in nutrition from North Carolina State University in 1993. Since then Dr. van Heugten has been employed by the Continental Grain Company in Chicago, Illinois. He is officed in 211A Polk Hall and his address is Box 7621.

Charles Stanislaw


PROFESSIONAL SWINE MANAGERS TRAINING

On July 17 and 18 North Carolina State University will be hosting the Professional Swine Managers Training Program that is sponsored by the National Pork Producers Council. This two-day event will be held at the McKimmon Conference Center at NCSU. Additional labor is required as the pork industry continues to expand. The success of any business lies in employing a team of qualified, committed employees. One of the most important areas that affects pork producers is attracting and keeping top-notch managers. Today's hog farm manager needs more and better labor, even while they are faced with a smaller labor pool. The Professional Swine Managers Training Program is a 2-level program focusing on Breeding, Nursery, and Grow-Finish phases. This session is designed to benefit breeding and nursery managers and is designed to:

Make plans to attend now, as this conference is limited to the first 50 registrations. For additional information, call (919) 515-8797; for registration, contact the National Pork Producers Council at (800) 667-1436.

Program

Day 1

The Changing Role of the Manager Handling Sows for Optimum Performance Exploiting Genetics Withinthe Breeding Herd The Manager's Role Using Artificial Insemination The Manager's Role Concerning Swine Nutrition The Manager's Role in Production Efficiency Measures Day 2

The Manager's Role in Environmental Issues

The Manager's Role in Herd Health What Makes Employees Tick

Todd See


CONDITION SCORING

Condition scoring is done by using finger pressure on points of the sow's body where the only tissue between skin and bones is fat tissue. By assessing the ease or difficulty of feeling the bones one can estimate the fat stores of the sow. The European method of condition scoring utilizes only the "H" bones, which are bones on the top of the sow's hips. Using the "H" bones along with the ribs and the "pin" bones, which are bones located on either side of the sow's vulva, which point backwards, does a more accurate job of assessing the degree of fat cover. The following Condition Scoring Guide shows how ease or difficulty of detection of the bones at the pressure points equates to score. The aim of condition scoring is to achieve a score of 3 in mid-late pregnancy and to maintain that score to farrowing. Sows that score 3 at farrowing enter the crate with adequate fat reserves to withstand a heavy lactation, but are not overconditioned to the point of reducing lactation feed intake. Sows that enter the crate at a score of 3 should eat well, milk well and wean at a condition score of 2.5 or higher, resulting in a rapid return to estrus. A realistic goal is to have all sows between 2.5 and 3 condition at farrowing, with 80% scoring 3.

To work effectively sows should be condition scored at breeding and at regular intervals between breeding and farrowing and feeding level should be adjusted accordingly. A typical procedure is to score sows at weaning, 30 day preg check, 50 day preg check and at approximately 80 days postbreeding. Scores can be recorded on the sow cards and feed boxes should be reset each time sows are condition scored.

How to Condition Score:

  1. Become familiar with the condition score descriptions on the Condition Scoring Guide.
  2. Locate the ribs, "H" bones and pin bones using firm finger pressure. It makes sense to start with the ribs and move back to the "H" bones and the pins. Sows tend to fatten from front to back and will carry slightly more fat over the ribs that the "H" and pin bones.
  3. Determine how easy or difficult it is to locate and feel the ribs, "H" bones and pin bones and determine a score for the sow. Don't let your eyes fool you. You may actually find a fair amount of fat on some thin-appearing sows, especially older sows.
  4. Record the score on the sow's card. This will allow you to track changes in condition throughout gestation.
  5. Adjust the sow's feeding level according to her score. Sows scoring 3 should be fed your "base" feeding level. Sows under 3 will need additional feed and sows over 3 can receive less than the "base" amount.

Condition Scoring Tips:

  1. Score in conjunction with another activity such as preg-checking to improve efficiency of time utilization.
  2. When you move sows to gestation, line them up by condition score. This will help prevent fat sows stealing feed from thin sows. It will also help you keep a better eye on the thin sows as they will be side-by-side in the crates.
  3. Keep all of your thinnest sows in the sow pool. These sows will benefit from receiving the higher energy, higher protein breeding ration and will recondition much more quickly.
  4. Sows scoring 2.0 or less need to be fed twice daily. Tape the front of the crates and hand feed the second feeding.
  5. Record condition scores on both sides of the sow cards so that they can be viewed from the rear when condition scoring again and from the front when checking feed boxes.
  6. Try not to look at the sow before you score her. Your eyes can bias your scoring.
  7. Keep it simple! Use a couple of simple thumb rules to keep your scores consistent:
  8. If the sow is between two scores and you can't decide which, give her the lower of the two scores and feed accordingly.

Condition Scoring Guide

Score Condition Detection of Ribs, H-bone, Pin Bones
5
Overfat No detection
4
Fat No detection
3.5
Rather Fat Great difficulty in detection
3
Ideal Barely felt with firm pressure
2.5
Slightly Thin Easily detected, some cover
2
Thin Easily detected, little cover
1
Emaciated Obvious, no cover

Sows Gilts
Targets Farrowing 2.5 - 3.0 3.0 - 3.5
Breeding 2.5 - 3.0 3.0

Condition score should be used to adjust feeding level as follows:

Feeding Guide

Condition Score Feeding Level
> 3.5
Base - 0.5 lb
3.0
Base*
2.5
Base + 0.5 lb
2.0
Base + 2.0 lb
< 2.0
Full Feed
*"Base" feeding level is the level of feed intake needed to maintain condition on a gestating sow. This will vary by genotype, feed type and facility environment. On most farms "base" is 4.0 to 4.5 pounds per day.

Chad Hagen, Iowa Falls IA
Adapted from proceedings of
Professional Swine Managers
Training, Cedar Rapids, IA
by Todd See


FEED INTAKE DECREASES WEANING-TO-ESTRUS INTERVAL IN SEW SOWS

While the pork industry is moving to Segregated Early Weaning (SEW) to improve the health, growth rate and feed efficiency of pigs, this management strategy can have a negative effect on the reproductive performance of sows. Previous studies have shown that sows that lactate for three weeks of less have a longer interval from weaning to estrus, subsequently produce smaller litters and have a lower farrowing rate.

A recent checkoff-funded study conducted at the University of Minnesota has reported that increasing feed intake for sows with short lactation periods decreases their weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI). Researchers synchronized the estrus cycles of 24 gilts. The gilts were then artificially inseminated and divided into four experimental groups. The first variable was short or long lactation length (12 days vs. 21 days), and the second variable was diet amount (6 kg vs. 2 kg per day).

The study found that cumulative feed intake on day 12 of lactation is critical for lactating sows to resume estrus promptly after weaning. The sows released increased levels of leuteinizing hormone (LH), a key reproductive hormone that controls ovarian follicular growth and the resumption of cycling activity post-weaning. Researchers found that sows in the high feed intake group, regardless of lactation length, had a greater LH concentration.

The investigators believe the results of this study can help producers using SEW to improve sow reproductive performance.

This abstract is from "Influence of Feed Intake and Lactation Length on Reproductive Performance, Circulating Levels of Glucose, Insulin and LH in Primiparous Sows," Yuzo Koketsu et al., University of Minnesota.

NPPC Tech Talk
Vol. 2, No. 1


Number of accesses to this file:
Last modified August 3, 2000.