NCSU Extension Swine Husbandry 1996


February, 1996 . Volume 19, Number 1

SATELLITE CONFERENCE ON ODOR

By now everyone should be aware of the satellite conference on "Practical Solutions to Odor Problems" Scheduled for airing on March 13. This conference is jointly sponsored by the National Pork Producers Council, PORK 96 and Pioneer Hi-bred International, Inc.

According to information released by the sponsors, this two hour conference will be shown from 7:00 to 9:00 pm CST, that's 6:00 to 8:00 pm here in North Carolina. Information scheduled to be presented will include:

Registration for this satellite conference is a modest amount of $15.00 and can be completed by calling 1800-344-4040. Those of you without your own satellite dish will be provided information on a satellite downlink site near you.

Payment of the registration fee will also provide you with a very helpful workbook that contains very valuable information on odor issues and how to deal with them.

Charles Stanislaw

Potential Odor Sources at Swine Production Farms

Source Cause Possible Remedy
1. farmstead swine production vegetative or wood buffers; recommended best management practices; good judgment and common sense
2. animal body surface dirty, manure-covered animals clean, dry floors
3. floor surface wet, manure-covered floors slotted floors; waters located over slotted floors; feeders at high end of solid floors; scrape manure buildup from floors; underfloor ventilation for drying
4. manure collection pit release of gases from urine and incomplete microbial decomposition frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge, or scrape; underfloor ventilation
5. pit exhaust fan gases and dust air scrubbing; biofiltration; vertical stack exhausting above roof ridgeline
6. side/end wall exhaust fan gases and dust efficient air movement 6-8; air scrubbing; biofiltration; vertical stack exhausting above roof ridgeline
7. feeder dust feeder covers; downspout extenders; feed additives
8. outside feed tank spilled, moldy feed keep mechanical equipment in good repair; remove spilled feed promptly
9. flush tank release of gases from agitation of recycled lagoon liquid while tank is filling flush tank cover; extend fill line to near bottom of tank with anti-siphon vent
10. flush alley release of gases from agitation of recycled lagoon liquid while flowing down alley underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
11. pit recharge point release of gases from agitation of recycled lagoon liquid while pit is filling extend recharge line to near bottom of pit with anti-siphon vent
12. outside drain collection or junction box release of gases from agitation of wastes box covers agitation of wastes while pit is draining
13. lift stations release of gases during sump tank filling and pump drawdown sump tank cover
14. end of drainpipe at lagoon release of gases from agitation of wastes extend discharge point of pipe underneath lagoon liquid level while pit is draining
15. lagoon surface release of gases from microbial decomposition, biological mixing, and agitation correct lagoon startup procedures; proper lagoon liquid capacity; minimum agitation when pumping; lagoon cover; mechanical aeration; biological additives
16. irrigation sprinkler release of gases from liquid due to high pressure agitation and wind drift irrigate on dry days with little nozzle lagoon or no wind; minimum recommended operating pressure; pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
17. storage basin surface release of gases from incomplete microbial decomposition of slurry, mixing while filling and agitation when emptying bottom or mid-level loading; surface mat of solids; biological additives
18. settling basin surface release of gases from incomplete microbial decomposition, mixing while filling, and agitation when emptying extend drainpipe outlet underneath lagoon liquid level; basin cover
19. manure slurry or sludge spreader outlet release of gases from agitation when spreading soil injection; biological additives
20. uncovered manure slurry or sludge on field surface release of gases while drying soil injection; soil incorporation within 48 hrs; biological additives
21. dead animal carcass decomposition proper disposition of carcass
22. dead animal disposal pit carcass decomposition complete covering of carcass in burial pit; proper location/construction of disposal pits
23. incinerator incomplete combustion secondary stack burner
24. standing eater around facilities improper drainage; microbial decomposition of organic matter grade and landscape such that water drains away from facilities
25. mud tracked poorly maintained access roads farm access road maintenance onto public roads from farm access

Jim Barker


INFLUENCE OF WEANING AGE ON PIGS/SOW/YEAR

Introduction

As the technology of rearing weaned pigs has improved, producers have been able to wean pigs at progressively younger ages. In earlier years, when weaning age was reduced from 56 days to 28 days, there was a large and significant increase in pigs per sow per year. As some producers have moved from 28 days weaning down to 21 days, and even down to 14 days (or younger) increase in sow productivity has not always been as evident.

How large an increase can be expected by decreasing weaning age, for example, by seven days? Under the basic assumption of a gestation length of 114 days, weaning age of 28 days, 9 pigs weaned per litter, weaning to rebreeding interval of 5 days, and overall farrowing rate of 85%, the pigs per sow per year is:

If weaning age is reduced to 21 days and all other parameters remain constant, the p/s/y becomes 19.96. Likewise, reducing weaning age to 14 days gives 20.96 p/s/y. The increase in p/s/y in this scenario is 1.0 pig per day sow per year for each 7 day reducing in weaning age, assuming all other variables are not affected by weaning age. We know, however, that these variables are affected by weaning age. The return to estrus of early-weaned sows will likely be increased and their conception and farrowing rate will decrease adding non-producitive days and reducing the P/S/Y yielded by this theoretical equation.

The Process of Rebreeding

Many physiological processes must resume funtion post partum for a sow to return to estrus postweaning and conceive. Upon weaning, sows must (Britt, 1995):

  1. Be able to grow mature ovarian follicles to produce estrogen to cause heat.
  2. Be able to show heat in response to increased levels of estrogen.
  3. Be able for the estrogen to induce an ovulatory surge of LH.
  4. Be able for the mature follicles to ovulate in response to the elevated LH.
  5. Be able for the uterus to transport sperm and eggs and for embryos to develop normally.

Lactation in the sow has the effect of interfering with process #1 by inhibiting the secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). When pigs are weaned and lactation ceases, the process is again activated and it continues through the complete cycle. This is true when weaning occurs at four weeks of age or later. The process still proceeds reasonable well with three-week weaning. However, as weaning age goes below three weeks of age, the normal course of events are increasingly disrupted by physiological responses that reduce reproductive efficiency.

These responses are (Britt, 1995):

The Net Effect

Measuring the net effect of early weaning on pigs/sow/year is actually a complex problem. Not only is there the direct effect on litter size, but also the effect on extending the interval from weaning to rebreeding plus the effect of an increase in culling on the average parity of the herd. If the question being asked in the effect on annual net profit, then parameters such as post-weaning mortality, cost of nursery feed, cost of lactation feed, facility cost and perhaps others need to be included.

Much of this information must come from retrogressive analysis of the production records of commercial production units . Several of these studies have appeared, notably by Te Brake (1978) and more recently by Culbertson and Mabry (1995).

In the later study, PigCHAMP records were used from 13 commercial herds. These records came from 1985 to 1995 and represented a mix of environment and genetics. in all there were 138,964 usable litter records that included:

These results of this study can be summarized as follows:

The Te Brake study extended beyond the weaning to first service interval and reviewed the effect of lactation length on pigs per sow per year. It was noted, for example, that as weaning age decreased culling level increased slightly. This, in turn, affected the parity makeup of the herd by increasing the proportion of first parity litters. Taking all this into account, Te Brake estimated that the highest number of 20 kg pigs was produced in herds with lactation lengths of 21-25 days and only slightly lower with 16-20 days lactations (Table 1)

Table 1. Effect of lactation length on pigs/sow/year

Lactation (days) Piglets/Litter Piglets (20 kg)
/Sow/Year
6-10
7.69
17.61
11-15
7.94
17.95
16-20
8.12
18.11
21-25
8.25
18.18
26-30
8.36
17.94
31-35
8.45
17.62

The Bottom Line

As these two studies show, early weaning is not without its negatives. In the range of weaning ages normally used by the industry today, the advantages in pigs per sow per year by earlier weaning is not large. However, there may be other advantages to earlier weaning, such as improved herd health with segregated early weaning. Even so, Vinson (1995) estimated that the return on investment and the cost of production by utilizing early weaning was relatively small (Table 2).

Table 2. Summary of effects of ROI and cost of production with $45 hog market

Item Reduction in
Cost of Production/cwt
ROI
Modern Genetics
$1.41
4.8%
Segregated Production
$0.73
1.8%
Phase Feeding
$0.51
1.0%
Split Sex Nutrition
$0.49
1.0%
Early Weaning
$0.14
0.3%
Artificial Insemination
$0.12
2.1%
Total
$3.40
11.0%

Charles Stanislaw


Number of accesses since March 27, 1996:
Last modified August 5, 2000.